Crafting Agentic Agents: Why Specialisation Outperforms Generic Bots
In every boardroom conversation about AI, the term “agent” now surfaces with regularity. Yet the difference between a generic bot and a high-performing agentic system is not cosmetic. It is the line between superficial automation and transformational impact.
At a private equity client earlier this year, that distinction became crystal clear. The firm had experimented with off-the-shelf assistants but found them underwhelming. They generated text, answered questions, and supported research—but they did little to move the financial needle.
The turning point came when the firm deployed a suite of specialised agentic agents built by Unique.ai. Unlike generic copilots, these agents were crafted with precise domain context, designed to integrate deeply into workflows and deliver measurable outcomes.
The Deployment: Agents With a Purpose
Three agents stood out in the deployment:
The Investment Insights Agent
Designed to process proprietary datasets and market intelligence, it cut the time to prepare personalised investor proposals by 80%. Partners could respond to prospects faster, tailoring pitches with a level of depth that previously required days of analyst work.The Due Diligence Agent
Tasked with automating document review, red-flag analysis, and compliance checks, it freed 60% of the investment team’s capacity. Analysts who once spent hours combing through contracts could now focus on higher-order questions: strategic fit, cultural alignment, and exit pathways.The Consultation Protocol Agent
Embedded directly into the firm’s meeting workflows, it automatically captured discussions, generated structured follow-ups, and logged insights into the CRM. Partner productivity improved, and knowledge no longer evaporated once meetings ended.
Each agent had a defined purpose, measurable metrics, and clear thresholds for when to escalate to humans. The difference was night and day compared to generic assistants.
Crafting, Not Procuring
The lesson was simple but profound: crafting agentic agents is a design exercise, not a procurement exercise.
Too many executives assume that adopting agents is like buying software licenses. But value is not unlocked by switching on a tool. It comes from:
Defining the job to be done: What specific outcome must the agent deliver?
Mapping decision rights: Which decisions can be automated? Which require human oversight?
Designing thresholds: At what point must the agent escalate to a manager?
Without these design choices, enterprises risk deploying generic assistants that generate impressive-sounding text but fail to integrate with the realities of the business.
Respecting the Domain
High-performing agents must understand the domain they serve. That means:
Integrating with legacy systems so they can access and act on real data, not just produce generic outputs.
Abiding by regulatory controls to ensure compliance in tightly governed industries like financial services, healthcare, and energy.
Surfacing insights, not just actions, so human managers can see the logic behind each recommendation.
Fail to respect the domain, and the result is predictable: an agent that asks repetitive clarifying questions, stalls workflows, and erodes trust.
Why Specialisation Breeds Value
The private equity deployment revealed the critical insight: specialisation breeds value.
Consider two sales agents.
The first is generic: it can draft emails, pull product information, and suggest talking points.
The second is specialised: it knows the organisation’s pricing logic, approval hierarchy, compliance rules, and customer tiers.
Only one of those agents delivers outcomes. The other gets stuck at the margins, creating noise rather than productivity.
Executives must understand that the real ROI of agentic systems comes when they are designed like colleagues—with defined roles, responsibilities, and performance metrics.
The Organisational Dimension
Building agentic agents is not only a technology challenge. It is an organisational design exercise.
Agents thrive when:
Teams view them as colleagues, not novelties.
Clear workflows establish who owns what between human and machine.
Companies invest in the integration fabric—APIs, data pipelines, governance layers—that let agents act confidently.
Without this, agents remain stranded prototypes, impressive in demonstrations but ineffective in production.
Implications for the C-Suite
For the CEO, the shift requires repositioning AI agents from side projects to strategy. The question is no longer “Should we experiment?” but “Where do specialised agents create defensible advantage in our value chain?”
For the CFO, the role is to insist on clear ROI projections. As the private equity case shows, agentic systems can cut cycle times by 80% and free 60% of human capacity. These are not efficiency side-effects; they are strategic levers.
For the CIO, the mandate is integration. High-performing agents are only as strong as the systems they connect to. CIOs must ensure data quality, API accessibility, and secure governance.
For the CHRO, the challenge is workforce alignment. When agents assume routine decisions, human teams must pivot to strategy, creativity, and relationship-driven work. That requires reskilling, role redesign, and incentive realignment.
A Board-Level Question
Boards should ask not whether AI agents are “useful” but whether the company has the discipline to craft them well.
Key oversight questions include:
Have we defined the “job to be done” for each agent?
Do we have the integration and governance fabric required?
Are we aligning incentives so that teams treat agents as colleagues, not competitors?
A generic approach produces generic returns. A crafted approach produces transformational results.
Final Word
The story of the private equity client illustrates the core message: not all agents are created equal.
Generic bots support, but specialised agentic agents deliver.
Generic bots answer, but agentic agents decide.
Generic bots exist on the periphery, but agentic agents integrate into the operating core.
For executives, the call to action is clear. Treat agentic agents as colleagues to be designed, not gadgets to be procured. Invest in the architecture, respect the domain, and define the roles.
Because in the era of enterprise AI, the organisations that craft their agents will outpace those that merely buy them.
https://www.nautilus-partners.digital/